Robert Faurisson in Court, 17 March 2016

Translated from a French report:

He firmly believes all that he says and nobody present in the courtroom would have dared to question it, not even the president of the tribunal.

In the course of explaining what led him to undertake his researches, he confesses his shame about the German victims at the end of the war and says (in English), “... I have to be a gentleman.” He passes from French to English a few times and from French to German whenever it seems necessary for imparting more precision to his argument, without ever omitting to translate word for word into the language of Molière. Regarding the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, he will say: “This trial is a disgrace!”

Read more on CODOH.

“Citizen Super PAC" releases video rehabilitating Hitler and Goebbels

Tweet

 

Why do I say that the video rehabilitates Hitler and Goebbels? Because it is not going to hurt Trump. The people who already support Trump -- which is now the majority of Republicans -- will find this video to be an attack on themselves as much as an attack on Trump. If Trump behaves true to form, he will not do what most politicians do when attacked in this way: he will not plead for understanding that he is not Hitler.

Therefore, Hitler and Goebbels are more likely to gain positive regard by the comparison, than Trump is to be harmed by it. On some level, to some degree, many people already admire Hitler anyway.

Do Hitler and Trump really have anything in common? Yes, they do. A few things, but they are not bad things. Trump and Hitler are both nationalists who champion the interests of ordinary people against plutocracy, and they both speak extemporaneously, and have to deal with organized disruption of their rallies by leftist troublemakers. Trump also advocates reconciliation among his fellow citizens for the good of the country as a whole, which, most Americans surely have no idea, was also a major theme with Hitler.

Hitler is not, however, the premier example of such a populist, anti-plutocratic leader. They existed also in the ancient world. The brothers Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus are an example from the Roman Republic, and Solon is an example from ancient Greece. 

One thing that is subtly misrepresented in the video, is when Hitler is shown referring to "the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe." The word rendered as "annihilation" is Vernichtung. It is tempting, for etymological reasons, to render Vernichtung as "annihilation," but that is not how the word was generally used. The practical meaning of Vernichtung in pre-1945 German was really quite vague. It could mean defeat or ruin. Consequently this much- quoted expression from Hitler's speech of 30 January 1939 contributes absolutely nothing toward a proof of the so-called Holocaust.

Who is behind "Conservative Solutions PAC"?

Tweet

This entity has been running misleading anti-Trump radio-spots in Florida since the day before Super Tuesday. 

One spot says about Trump: "He banned disabled veterans from his highrise."

In fact Trump has not banned disabled veterans as such from any of his buildings. He has complained over the course of many years, since 1991, to the City of New York about street-vendors with special "disabled veteran" licenses turning Fifth Avenue into a flea-market outside of Trump Tower.

Another anti-Trump spot complains: "He praised Russian gangster Vladimir Putin."

That is a very Jewish complaint, since it is Putin who has thwarted the Zionist-Jew plan to overthrow Bashar al-Assad and create chaos in Syria.

The following names were reported to the Federal Election Commission as having donated $200 or more to this PAC. Note that there are no donations of less than $50,000. This PAC certainly represents the interests of some very rich people, many of whom are well known to be Jews.

The name at the top of the list, Paul Singer, is that of a Jewish hedge-fund manager who promotes "gay rights." Is that really conservative?

SINGER, PAUL ELLIOT NEW YORK, NY 10019	ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT CORP.	11/25/15	$2,500,000
GRIFFIN, KENNETH C CHICAGO, IL 60603	CITADEL, LLC	12/14/15	$2,500,000
BESILU STABLES, LLC MIAMI, FL 33165		06/29/15	$2,500,000
BRAMAN, NORMAN MIAMI, FL 33137	BRAMAN MOTORS, INC.	06/22/15	$2,000,000
ELLISON, LAWRENCE J WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596	ORACLE	06/24/15	$2,000,000
PERLMUTTER, LAURA LAKE WORTH, FL 33460	NOT EMPLOYED	06/08/15	$2,000,000
BRAMAN, NORMAN MIAMI, FL 33137	BRAMAN MOTORS, INC.	04/17/15	$1,500,000
BRAMAN, NORMAN MIAMI, FL 33137	BRAMAN MOTORS, INC.	05/17/15	$1,500,000
ASNESS, CLIFF NEW YORK, NY 10017	AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT	12/31/15	$1,000,000
BRAMAN, NORMAN MIAMI, FL 33137	BRAMAN MOTORS, INC.	12/23/15	$1,000,000
SPENCER, MARY M KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149	INVESTOR	10/19/15	$1,000,000
HUMPHREYS, DAVID C JOPLIN, MO 64803	TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS	12/15/15	$1,000,000
ELLISON, LAWRENCE J WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596	Oracle Corporation	01/20/16	$1,000,000
ELLISON, LAWRENCE J WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596	ORACLE	05/18/15	$1,000,000
DEGEORGE, LAWRENCE F JUPITER, FL 33477	DEG CAPITAL	05/19/15	$500,000
RUBRIGHT, JAMES A ATLANTA, GA 30305	PRIVET FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC	04/18/15	$500,000
IGX, LLC WILMINGTON, DE 19808		10/26/15	$500,000
MCNAIR, ROBERT C HOUSTON, TX 77054	HOUSTON TEXANS	08/24/15	$500,000
CLINE, CHRIS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410	THE CLINE GROUP	09/28/15	$500,000
BERKOWITZ, BRUCE R CORAL GABLES, FL 33143	FAIRHOLME CAPITAL MANAGEMENT	11/12/15	$250,000
ACCESS INDUSTRIES, INC NEW YORK, NY 10019		12/08/15	$250,000
FLORIDA CRYSTALS CORPORATION WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401		12/30/15	$250,000
KLARMAN, SETH A BOSTON, MA 02117	THE BAUPOST GROUP, LLC	12/04/15	$250,000
SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF AMERICA, INC MIRAMAR, FL 33027		07/29/15	$250,000
POPE, JAMES A RALEIGH, NC 27609	Variet Wholesalers, Inc	01/19/16	$250,000
HARLAN R CROW FAMILY BRANCH PARTNERSHIP DALLAS, TX 75219		01/20/16	$250,000
DEVOS, RICHARD GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503	retired	01/19/16	$250,000
KENDRICK, RANDY PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253	Arizona Diamondback Baseball	01/25/16	$200,000
TRAVEL RETAIL GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC MIAMI, FL 33238		06/29/15	$200,000
COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP PAC, INC ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313		10/02/15	$200,000
HERRO, DAVID CHICAGO, IL 60610	HARRIS ASSOCIATES, LP	11/20/15	$150,000
COLLUM'S ADMIN & MAINT, LLC ALLENDALE, SC 29810		06/24/15	$150,000
GEO CORRECTIONS HOLDINGS, INC BOCA RATON, FL 33487		04/17/15	$100,000
GRIFFIN, KENNETH C CHICAGO, IL 60603	CITADEL, LLC	06/24/15	$100,000
GROFF, SUSAN L DALLAS, TX 75202	NORTHWEST EXCAVATING	06/08/15	$100,000
FLORIDA CRYSTALS CORPORATION WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401		06/29/15	$100,000
HERRO, DAVID CHICAGO, IL 60610	HARRIS ASSOCIATES, LP	04/24/15	$100,000
HIRSCH, LAURENCE E DALLAS, TX 75201	HIGHLANDER PARTNERS, LP	04/24/15	$100,000
KENDRICK, RANDY PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253	ARIZONA DIAMONDBACK BASEBALL	06/19/15	$100,000
RUST, ROBERT W CORAL GABLES, FL 33146	RETIRED	04/28/15	$100,000
STOFIN CO, INC WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401		06/29/15	$100,000
SANDLER, RICKY C NEW YORK, NY 10128	EMINENCE CAPITAL, LP	12/22/15	$100,000
VANDERSLOOT, FRANK L IDAHO FALLS, ID 83405	MELALEUCA, INC.	12/31/15	$100,000
CONSERVATIVES FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313		12/04/15	$100,000
CROW, HARLAN DALLAS, TX 75219	CROW HOLDINGS	08/24/15	$100,000
GAINES, STANLEY PALM BEACH, FL 33480	RETIRED	10/02/15	$100,000
GROFF, SUSAN L NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324	NORTHWEST EXCAVATING CO., INC.	12/09/15	$100,000
AMERICAS EXPORT CORPORATION WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401		06/29/15	$100,000
AGRO-INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401		06/29/15	$100,000
TMCV #2 LLC IDAHO FALLS, ID 83402		12/30/15	$90,000
NG MONTANA LLC IDAHO FALLS, ID 83402		12/29/15	$85,000
FERNANDEZ, RAUL J WASHINGTON, DC 20037	Monumental Sports and Ent	01/27/16	$60,000
KENDRICK, RANDY PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253	Arizona Diamondback Baseball	01/28/16	$50,000
SWEZY, LEWIS MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016	CENTENNIAL MANAGEMENT CORP.	05/20/15	$50,000
ZIPPER, JEFFREY A BOCA RATON, FL 33496	JAZ COMPANY	05/20/15	$50,000
STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INC ST LOUIS, MO 63102		06/26/15	$50,000
LION FINANCIAL, LLC MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140		05/20/15	$50,000
MARGOLIS, RICHARD A MALIBU, CA 90265	COLUMBUS PACIFIC PROPERTIES	06/26/15	$50,000
NORTH CYPRESS MEDICAL CTR OPER CO, LTD CYPRESS, TX 77429		06/24/15	$50,000
HERTOG, ROGER NEW YORK, NY 10151	HERTOG FOUNDATION	04/06/15	$50,000
AMERICAN HEALTHWORKS, LLC FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316		05/20/15	$50,000
NICHOLS, J LARRY OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73116	DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION	12/21/15	$50,000
REGAN, ROBERT M JR ARLINGTON, VA 22207	21ST CENTURY FOX	10/27/15	$50,000
KINGDON, MARK NEW YORK, NY 10028	KINGDON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC	12/26/15	$50,000
TAPIA, DON PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253	RETIRED	10/14/15	$50,000
HELIOS HOLDINGS ATLANTA, GA 30339		12/31/15	$50,000
ARNOTT, ROBERT D CORONO DEL MAR, CA 92625	RESEARCH AFFILIATES	06/25/15	$50,000
FUSSNER, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, WY 83001	TRANS-TEC USA	09/10/15	$50,000
CORCORAN, MICHAEL C ODESSA, FL 33556	CORCORAN & JOHNSTON	09/29/15	$50,000
COLLUM'S SAWMILL, LLC ALLENDALE, SC 29810		12/29/15	$50,000

Mark Weber's Dereliction of Duty as Director of the IHR

Tweet

Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker
An aid to comprehension for viewers of Jim Rizoli's interview of Mark Weber (10 February 2016) 

Part One

Anybody who has not taken a particular interest in Historical Revisionism is likely to find little to criticize in Mark Weber's statements to Jim Rizoli in this interview. Such a viewer will likely be impressed that Weber speaks well of Holocaust Revisionists and defends their right to raise "questions."

If Mark Weber were a professor at a university or a mainstream public figure, that would be a net benefit. The problem is that Mark Weber does not occupy any such position but is the director of the Institute for Historical Review. He is supposed to be a leader in Holocaust Revisionism, not a spectator benevolently defending that movement's free-speech rights.

As an historian and as the director of the Institute, Mark Weber is supposed to be dealing in hard facts and logic and reaching conclusions about history. The motto of the Institute for Historical Review is: "to bring history into accord with the facts," and from its founding in 1978 the Institute was to be focused especially on dissecting and debunking what almost nobody else wanted to touch, that great body of destructive legends known as the Holocaust of the Jews. That was why the Institute for Historical Review was needed. The Institute was thus always intended to be radical, uncompromising, and at the vanguard of controversy. At one time it was. You will notice however that in this interview, uncompromising conclusions about the Holocaust are something that Mark Weber prefers to avoid. 

Read more.

Semi-Revisionists

Part Two

In the first part, I showed that Mark Weber, in his interview with Jim Rizoli, consistently tried to avoid acknowledging any findings of Holocaust Revisionism, and also tried to conceal his past acknowledgment of such findings. In this part, the focus is on Weber's attempts to justify his retreat from Holocaust Revisionism.

Mark Weber gives several arguments to justify his current refusal to support the revisionist findings that he once supported in regard to the Holocaust. I was able to discern the following, somewhat contradictory arguments, listed here in ascending order of absurdity:

1. The question of whether the Holocaust-story is true or false is no longer relevant.

2. Although the truth about the Holocaust is relevant (contradicting the previous point) it should not be relevant!

3. There is no point in disputing the Holocaust because Jews really were gassed!

Read more.

Texe Marrs: The only political party in the USA is the Jew Party.

Tweet

Despite his religious outlook, Texe Marrs is an astute observer.
Ted Cruz is "one of these people," says Texe Marrs.



Marrs does not directly say that Cruz is a Jew because there is no direct proof, but the circumstantial indicators are strong.

Since Marrs views the world from a religious perspective, the way he explains what he observes is not exactly the way I would explain it. It does not mean that his observations are bad, only that the different framework for interpretation has to be taken into account.

Marrs' reference to Jews as Satan-worshippers makes sense if you take it as a metaphor. The Gospels, in the traditional Christian interpretation, constitute an aetiological myth explaining why Jews are the enemies of the rest of mankind.

The strongest determining factor in how people behave, however, is not religion but inherited character. This is also true of the Muslim immigrants in Europe: they behave as they do not so much because of their religion as because of their inherited character.

Marrs also makes a mistake when he says that the Stasi was the ruling political party in the part of Germany that was in the Communist Bloc. Stasi means Staatsicherheitspolizei -- State Security-Police. Anetta Kahane is a Jewish woman who was an agent of the Stasi and is currently involved in efforts to stifle nationalist speech in Germany.

Bradley Smith, Major Holocaust Revisionist, dies on his 86th Birthday

Tweet

More precisely, Smith was an important promoter of revisionism, from the perspective of a freethinker. He was not a scholar, but rather an activist for the right of revisionist arguments to be heard, especially at universities.

This is an interview from only two months ago.

A Court without Law, by Heinrich Haertle -- part 12

Tweet

Prof. Dr. Hermann Jahrreiss

International Injustice

From Freispruch für Deutschland by Heinrich Haertle

Translated by Hadding Scott, 2016

This authority gained through no law and only through military force is already refuted at its foundations in the pleading about international law by Professor Jahrreiss. As we have stated, Dr. Jahrreiss explicitly professes on behalf of the German defense-team the exalted purpose of fulfilling a primordial longing of humanity and, through an expanded international law, securing a just and enduring order of peace. Two preconditions however would first have to be met:

1. These new laws should not nullify their own legality by being applied retroactively and one-sidedly.

2. A supranational authority must first be created that can function as a world-legislature and world-executive.

For, as long as these conditions cannot be fulfilled, no court may claim the right to convict and to punish persons affiliated with a state or a government for a crime against peace.

According to recognized international law the breach of a political treaty is also nothing other than a violation of international law. The treaty-breaking state has committed a tort under international law (Völkerrechtsdelikt), but not a crime (strafbare Handlung).

Therefore, Jahrreiss demonstrates, there was no international criminal law until then.

Even if the German Reich in 1939 had violated a non-aggression pact -- which in the case of Poland was no longer possible, since the relevant treaty had been terminated -- even in this case Germany would have committed, and therefore under the rules of international law would have been liable for, only a tort:

"But only the Reich, not the individual, even if he were the head of state. This is beyond all doubt according to presently recognized international law." [Hermann Jahrreiss, "The Breach of Peace between States and its Culpability," IMT transcript, Supplement B, Part 1, II]

Professor Jahrreiss then thoroughly substantiates this position through the historical facts of the period after the First World War:

"For up to the most recent times not even the possibility was mentioned, either in the Manchurian, or in the Italo-Abyssinian, or in the Russo-Finnish conflict, of instituting criminal proceedings against those people who were responsible, on the Japanese, Italian, or Russian side, for planning, preparing, launching, and conducting the war or who simply participated in these acts in any way. And it was certainly not because matters had, paradoxically enough, not been thought out to the end, that they were not prosecuted. They were not prosecuted because this cannot take place as long as the sovereignty of states is the organizational basic principle of interstate order." [Hermann Jahrreiss, IMT transcript, 4 July 1946]

The state would have to surrender the most consequential event in the state's life, the decision for war or peace, to foreign states or to an international body.

The state would necessarily in effect dissolve itself, if it would have the question of its existence decided by others. The Nuremberg "laws" are only applicable if the sovereign state is already smashed.

Professor Jahrreiss indicates to the court this sequence of actions:

The Prosecution breaks up in its own mind the German State at a time when it stood upright in its full strength and acted through its organs. It must do so if it desires to prosecute individual persons for a breach of the peace between states. It must turn the defendants into private individuals. [Hermann Jahrreiss, ibid.]

With what do the Allied judges want to replace the state? Even now, states are the only subjects of international law. Where is a supranational authority that had already taken their place in 1939? Professor Jahrreiss holds this crucial fact against the tribunal:

"The regulations of the Charter deny the basis of this law*; they anticipate the law of a world state." [Hermann Jahrreiss, ibid.]

Against this legal-scientific and legal-philosophical criticism from the most important German expert on international law, the Allied jurists can offer only their old excuses and slogans. At the close of his pleading, Professor Jahrreiss again summarizes his defense of international law against international despotism (des Völkerrechts gegen internationale Willkür) -- cautious in form, but unambiguous in substance:

"Sentences against individuals for breach of the peace between states presuppose other laws than those in force when the actions laid before this Tribunal took place.

"The legal question of guilt -- and I am here only concerned with that -- is thus posed in its full complexity, for not one of the defendants could have held even one of the two views of the legal world constitution, on which the chief prosecutors base their arguments." [Hermann Jahrreiss, ibid.]

___________________________________________
* The argument is a little clearer in German. The usual term for international law is Völkerrecht, which literally means "law of peoples" or "law of nations." Obviously there cannot be a "law of nations" unless there are nation-states. Nation-states are therefore the basis for international law.